AoC & CP laws *are* child abuse if anything is

Consent is remarkably difficult to define, well, definitively, let alone prove, disprove, or effectively enforce. It is absurd to leave such a complex endeavor to busybodies and bureaucrats of the State, who routinely mangle even the simplest of tasks.

That said, the rationale for age of consent, child pornography, and child prostitution laws stems from a literally sex-negative premise: each child must have the “right” to say no to sex, but not the freedom to say yes.

If forcing a child to have sex is abuse, why is forcing a child not to have sex any less abusive?

For that matter, if forcing a child to have sex is abuse, why not forcing a child to ride in an automobile, which is usually far more dangerous than almost any sexual activity? How about forcing a child to eat foods replete with sugars and complex carbohydrates, arguably raising numerous health risks by a large margin? How about forcing a child to attend public school where he or she will be forced to pledge allegiance to the State and will be indoctrinated in “patriotic” pro-government, nationalistic, and militaristic ideology? What might constitute abuse depends on one’s perspective. Yet when it comes to sexuality and especially the sexuality of young people, one sex-negative moralist perspective is violently imposed upon everyone.

Why should we trust the State to protect children? The most powerful State in the world somehow cannot afford to install seat belts on school buses, yet manages to budget billions upon billions to maim and kill children across the globe. It is not plausible that those who rape children’s sexual freedom are motivated largely by a genuine desire to protect children. Rather, such “protection” is functionally a protection racket and serves as a cover for ulterior motives such as power and profit.

Corporate Media: “Thailand fights to stem tide of child sex tourists”

I find it quite telling how in this article, child prostitution is portrayed as automatically “evil” and sex tourists are demonized. This encourages a Manichean view of morality, people, and the world which hardly lends itself well to remotely rational discussion. I’m also disturbed by the misleading terminology being employed; e.g., now even in Thailand the definition of child has been stretched to include teens with full sexual development:

“Last year, 2,888 people were charged with having sex with children under 15 in Thailand.”

Children under 15? Many 13, 14, 15 year old girls are as sexually developed as they ever will be. Moreover, notions of a “teenage brain” inferior to that of adults (adult being an arbitrary category set by the State) are neither less dubious nor less agenda-driven than notions of blacks’ or women’s brains being less developed than those of white men. That doesn’t stop such notions from being touted in the oh-so “progressive” corporate media as gospel truth.

Article Link @CNN

Against Moralism

People who state that a particular sexual behavior is morally wrong are stating a belief. Why should I or anyone else with at least a shred of skepticism take them at their word?

I could just as easily say that because of “overpopulation,” everyone should stop procreating. (This is just for the sake of argument; I don’t really believe that!) Or I could say that everyone should stop procreating, because some children are bound to be “molested,” and in order to avoid this risk it is better that children never be born. (Or that either.) In either case why should anyone take me at my word? Sure, you can simply take a belief on faith if you’re not a very skeptical person. But if you’re going to believe that child prostitution is wrong “because it is wrong” then why not believe in the existence of Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny or competent politicians if it feels “right?”

There is a glaring lack of evidence for objective moral right and wrong. Sure, it is possible there is some objective moral code floating ’round somewhere in the ether, but people can’t agree on what that might be. Some people feel sex outside marriage is wrong. Some feel the same about eating meat. Does that mean we should sit back and let them force their beliefs on everyone else through State power?

We let people under a certain age ride in automobiles (usually far more dangerous than sex); we let people under a certain age receive risky vaccinations and surgeries; we let people under a certain age be indoctrinated in the name of education, yet involvement in a sexual relationship is suddenly beyond the pale? The fact that large numbers of people believe just that hardly makes it true. If you’re an atheist, should you believe in God just because the majority of people do? To be blunt, let’s not let the moralists out there set the rules. The problem isn’t sex, even when it involves people of the “wrong” ages. The problem is certain bigotries and prejudices being forced onto everyone by the monopoly power of the State.

Polanski Freed. Switzerland says NO to US Extradition

I don’t put any trust in the government account of what happened. However, even if it were true, I am still glad Polanski was not extradited to the US.

Piling on Polanski does not even have strategic value. People who are set on hating us will hate us no matter what we say.

What do you think?

BERN, Switzerland — The Swiss government declared renowned film director Roman Polanski a free man on Monday after rejecting a U.S. request to extradite him on a charge of having sex in 1977 with a 13-year-old girl.

The Swiss mostly blamed U.S. authorities for failing to provide confidential testimony about Polanski’s sentencing procedure in 1977-1978.

The Justice Ministry also said that national interests were taken into consideration in the decision.

“The 76-year-old French-Polish film director Roman Polanski will not be extradited to the USA,” the ministry said in a statement. “The freedom-restricting measures against him have been revoked.”

More here.

Woman puts teen’s face on bestiality photo

This is bullshit. She shouldn’t have to serve a day.

One doesn’t even have to be all radical to realize that. Even if the pictures are mean or offend some people’s notions of sexual propriety, still, we’re talking pictures. Images. Bits and bytes. It’s just a visual way of saying that the girl is a dog-fucker. Maybe mean since so-called polite society is so hung up about dog-fucking (though less so than about pedophilia!) and potentially with sexually sadistic motivations, but so what? Being threatened with prison time for photoshopping some porn is crazy.

Woman puts teen’s face on bestiality photo, shares flier at school

A Salt Lake City woman has been charged with felonies and is accused of digitally pasting the head of a 13-year-old girl onto fliers depicting bestiality then distributing those fliers at the girl’s school.

Court charges say the 37-year-old woman sought to retaliate against the girl for “perceived wrongs.”

On May 25, a custodian at Northwest Middle School found fliers in a girl’s restroom. The fliers showed a naked female in a sex act with a dog and someone had altered the picture of the female to include the head of the 13-year-old, court documents say. The flier also called the girl’s name.

Police said in court documents they reviewed surveillance video and saw the defendant enter the restroom. The woman later admitted to police she made the fliers, court documents say.

The woman is charged with 18 counts of sexual exploitation of a minor. Each count is a second-degree felony punishable by one to 15 years in prison and could force the woman to register as a sex offender.

Sltrib.com

Derbyshire: “Reading Lolita”

Karomesis (and everyone!) will find this article by eclectic and eccentric “biocon” pundit John Derbyshire of interest. Slightly dated, but interesting indeed.

Reasoning that a rapist is inspired to his passion mainly by the physical attractiveness of his victim, [biologist] Razib [Khan] went for rape statistics. He found a 1992 report (Rape in America: A Report to the Nation) from the National Victim Center showing the age distribution of female rape victims. Sixty percent of the women who reported having been raped were aged 17 or less, divided about equally between women aged 11 to 17 (32 percent) and those under eleven (29 percent). Only six percent were older than 29. When a woman gets past her mid twenties, in fact, her probability of being raped drops off like a continental shelf. If you histogram the figures, you get a peak around ages 12-14… which is precisely the age Lolita was at the time of her affair with Humbert Humbert.

I’m not big on hard and fast AoAs but these age ranges remind me of what I see in my mind’s eye when I picture the Ultimate Sex Harem.

As I’ve said before, I tend to look at Expert Opinion™ with a skeptical eye and strongly value thinking for myself. I don’t suddenly suspend my sense of skepticism when it comes to Experts™ who make their pronouncements in the name of science. At the same time, I strive to read scientific research and theory with an open mind.

Ironically though, one would never have to read even a single Evo Psych paper to notice that rape is about power, not sex is an idiotic false dichotomy –  or observe that rapists will most often pick young and pretty prey when able to do so!

Sovereignist Flags & Symbols

center

Sovereignist Flag

Display these colors to show your support for Sovereignism!

Sovereignists support maximum freedom for our minds, bodies, and not least of all our sexualities, through the ultimate abolition of the power-monopoly that is the State. This is to be accomplished via practical yet revolutionary means, i.e., the development of market alternatives to better provide every product or service now offered by the State, as well as superior outlets for instinctual needs that the state-corporate complex is unable or unwilling to honestly address.

Sovereignists take notice of the role of sexual repression in perpetuating the System. Sovereignism is a sex-positive movement. The shade of pink used in our flag is Pussy Pink – literally! This particular pink is taken from the photographed vagina of a stunningly sexy young starlet using the ‘eyedropper’ tool of a graphics program. No choice of color could be more sex-positive than that!

In this thread, feel free to post feedback for this flag design as well as your ideas for more additional flag designs and other symbols to display in support of Sovereignism.

A bit down the road we will begin manufacturing physical flags for people for purchase and display to show solidarity with the Sovereignist cause.

Saying No to the Cult of Consent

The matter of consent is nowhere near as black-and-white as do-gooder busybodies make it out to be.

For example: One day she says yes to sex; the next she feels guilty, retroactively changes her mind, and subsequently files sexual assault charges. In the ensuing environment of hysteria, her ‘rapist’ is convicted and sentenced to years in prison. It can happen!

Sexuality is not politically correct. Contrary to the victim-feminist party line, females do often say no when they mean yes. If treated like fragile pieces of china, they’re more likely to get bored silly than anything else. “Consent” is cut-and-dry only to people knee-deep in what Robert Anton Wilson called Ideal Platonic Horseshit. In the real world, no pain, no gain will often apply in practically every worthwhile endeavor one can name; there’s no reason sexual activities would be exceptional in this regard. Many, perhaps most, of the most fulfilling and pleasurable activities require at least an initial push, and often discomfort.

The State has no business telling us when, where, or how to have sex. Centrally planned moralities are just as prone to failure as centrally planned economies! Even if busybodies were largely altruistic true believers, they’d always fuck up, because real, living, breathing human beings are never so simple and straightforward as their hyper-autistic* social engineering formulas would indicate.

*May as well use one of the therapeutic state’s invented disorders against it.

Should all porn be legalized? No!

Got your attention, didn’t it?

But it’s not just for shock value.

All porn should be decriminalized, not legalized!

Rather than get ‘permission’ from Big Brother – opening the door to further red tape, licensing, cartelization, regulation and taxation of sexual expression – Big Brother can get the fuck out of our business. The glorified protection racket known as the State never had any right to tell us what we can and can’t produce, distribute, or consume to begin with.

We don’t beg tapeworms for permission to enjoy sovereignty over our bodies; we flush them out. Likewise, rather than beg suit-and-tie parasites for permission to enjoy sovereignty over our bodies, we need to endeavor to free ourselves from their control.

‘Stop Vigilante Violence and Websites Act of 2010′

The Stop Vigilante Violence and Websites Act of 2010 is a piece of proposed legislation authored by activist Derek Logue. An online petition in favor of the act is available here.

I will not sign the petition, because I do not agree with the proposed Act. I’m far more afraid of State violence than vigilante violence. I know many people who love me for who I am. They wouldn’t want me subjected to bullshit “therapy,” civilly committed, locked up or executed in any scenario. I can’t say the same about the State.

There are other ways to deal with antis than going begging to the State. Think outside the box of dependency.

Too many people have become weenies who buy into the delusion that government thugs are any more trustworthy with guns than anyone else.

It is best that we oppose all State restrictions on expression. The last thing we need is for the State to turn people like us into a “protected group,” and therefore rendered pathetically dependent upon and harmless to the ruling classes.